This article holds notes on my experience unpacking a Smokeloader 2020 sample. The unpacked payload is further used for composing a valid PE file. The outcome is a PE32 executable containing clean code ready for reversing.
First things first, here is the sample used in this research:
Size | 308.17 KB (315568 bytes) |
Type | PE32 executable for MS Windows (GUI) Intel 80386 32-bit |
First seen | 2020-03-06 21:45:11 |
md5 | c067e0a2d7fc6092bb77abc7f7156b60 |
sha1 | 52f68073caec0fd424c7cbaaed5f5221d7103d20 |
sha256 | 25959cfe4619126ab554d3111b875218f1dbfadd79eed1ed0f6a8c1900fa36e0 |
You can find it in VirusTotal [1].
This sample does regular already documented Smokeloader checks before unpacking the main payload, such as:
- checks if the process is running in the context of a debugger using "kernel32.isDebuggerPresent" function [2];
- makes a copy of ntdll.dll, loads it and uses it instead. This technique helps to evade some sandboxes and has been described already in this article here [3];
- looks for specific patterns in registry keys to check if the sample is running under a virtualised environment.
It also performs a small profiling of the hosting machine in order to decide which payload to inject. Smokeloader has specific code for both main architectures x86 and x64. In this article, we gonna unpack the x86 payload of the above mentioned sample.
Smokeloader has been using various techniques to inject its final payload into the user file management process "explorer.exe". The sample analysed uses RtlCreateUserThread approach in order to copy the final payload to the targeted process. This injection method is better described in this Endgame/Elastic article [4].
So our game plan is:
- pause execution before the unpacked payload is executed by "explorer.exe";
- transplant this code to a dummy PE shell;
- fix PE header values and section boundaries;
- patching Smokeloader code preamble;
- test unpacked Smokeloader PE;
- how to do all this programatically using LIEF [5].
Smokeloader 1st stage decompresses its payload using ntdll.RtlDecompressBuffer [6] after few anti-analysis checks described above. It does not call this function from the initially loaded ntdll.dll but from a copy of it loaded afterwards. So breakpoints should be set after the binary loads the copy of ntdll.dll. Figure 01 presents a screenshot of this specific code IDA.
Figure 01: Smokeloader first stage decompression code |
This code allocates a buffer with 0x2D000 bytes using ZwAllocateVirtualMemory which stores the main decompressed payload [7]. This code is still transformed before being injected into "explorer.exe". The following steps are performed during injection:
- fetches explorer.exe PID by calling GetShellWindow and GetWindowThreadProcessId;
- sections and maps are created in the current and remote processes using ZwCreateSection and ZwMapViewOfSection;
- main payload is copied to local section and reflected in the remote section;
- data section is created in the remote process for holding parameters and dynamically created Import Table;
- A new thread is created in the remote process by invoking RtlCreateUserThread.
So, at this point, you could ask me: what is the relevance of describing all these call names to the final goal of this article? the answer is: so you can reproduce exactly what I'm describing in here. :D
Next step is setting up a break point in RtlCreateUserThread (from the copy of ntdll.dll) and dump the final payload. It is also necessary to take note of few important addresses: (i) entry point of the thread created in the remote processes and (ii) base addresses for injected code in virtual process.
Figure 02 shows a screenshot of IDApro showing the call to RtlCreateUserThread (where we should pause the execution).
Figure 02: Call to RtlCreateUserThread after injecting code into remote process |
By stoping the execution on this call we can collect all data we need to move on to the next step:
Base address code | 0x02060000 |
Base address data | 0x00B60000 |
Data payload | a01751fb6eb3f19d9b010818bbecc23c [8] |
Code payload | 2547231b4ae82ea9e395fb0c8a308982 [9] |
Code entry point | 0x02061734 |
Code payload is the final unpacked Smokeloader code adjusted to run on Virtual Address with base equal to 0x02060000. The created thread receives the base address of the data segment (0x00B60000) as parameter ("StartParameter" parameter of "RtlCreateUserThread" call).
Smokeloader loads all resources necessary to its execution dynamically. This article here [10] describes how Smokeloader builds up its import table and how to prepare patch an IDB to overcome this technique before starting reversing. So this main payload does not need any specific setup of imports.
In this section we will use 010 Hex Editor [11] to transplant a PE header from a random executable. 010 Hex Editor has a PE format template [12]. Although any other valid PE32 binary could be used in this experiment, we used a PE header extracted from an executable listed in this Sotirov's blog post [13][14].
Smokeloader code payload has 0x1000 null bytes at offset zero, so we copied the first 0x1000 bytes containing the PE header from tinype.exe to this region.
Coincidently, .text section will be already pointing to the beginning of the our payload at offset 0x1000. Probably the malware author just wiped out the PE header before creating the payload and left the null bytes there. Next step is to paste all 20480 bytes (0x5000) of our data payload in the offset 0x4400.
Figure 03 shows the new layout of our binary containing the PE header in the beginning followed by 0x3400 bytes of code payload (at offset 0x1000) and finally 0x5000 bytes of data from our data payload (at offset 0x4400).
Figure 03: Initial layout of new handcrafted PE binary |
It is time to adjust our implanted PE header manually using 010 Hex Editor. At this point, all fields in this header are still set up according "tinype.exe". From now on, we gonna use this schematic as reference to PE header internal structures [15].
The first adjustment is to change the number of sections to 2 for holding code and data. This field is located in the "COFFHeader.NumberOfSections". Now our binary will list only 2 sections named ".text" and ".rdata" we can rename this second one to ".data" by changing "SectionHeaders[1].Name".
Next step is make sure that both sections have correct permissions. "SectionHeaders[0].Characteristics" (".text") should have CODE, EXECUTE and READ flags active and "SectionHeaders[1].Characteristics" (".data") should have the INITIALIZED_DATA, READ and WRITE flags active. Still on SectionHeaders, we can setup the bounds and virtual addresses. "SectionHeaders[0].SizeOfRawData" should be set to 0x3400 (13312 Bytes), "SectionHeaders[0].PointerToRawData" should be set to "0x1000" and finally "SectionHeaders[0].VirtualAddress" should be set to 0x1000. For "SectionHeaders[1]" (".data") we gonna set "SizeOfRawData" to 0x5000, "PointerToRawData" to 0x4400 and "VirtualAddress" to 0x5000. These changes means that these sections will be mapped in memory in base_address (defined in the OptionalHeader) shifted by each section Virtual Addresses offset. There is an Union inside these section headers called "PhysicalAddress" and "VirtualSize", these fields should hold the same value as "SizeofRawData".
Figure 04 shows a diagram of a Section header. Each section in the binary has an instance of this header associated to it.
Figure 04: PE Section Header |
Now we need to adjust few fields in the Optional Header. In this header we will need to change the following fields:
ImageBase | Virtual Address where binary will be mapped | 0x02060000 |
SizeOfCode | size of .text section | 0x3400 bytes |
SizeOfInitializedData | size of .text and .data sections together | 0x8400 bytes |
AddressOfEntryPoint | offset of the entry point code | 0x1734 |
BaseOfCode | .text section Virtual Address | 0x1000 |
BaseOfData | .data section Virtual Address | 0x5000 |
SectionAlignment | Virtual Addresses have to be multiple of this value | 0x1000 |
FileAlignment | file offsets have to be multiple of this value | 0x200 |
SizeOfImage | total size of binary headers + sections | 0x9400 |
Checksum | PE file checksum - use PE Explorer [16] or Hiew [17] to calculate this value | -------- |
"ImageBase" has to match the base of the code section we dumped from "explorer.exe" (0x02060000). As we will not export or import anything all "Data Directories" inside the Optional Header can be zeroed as well.
Summarising the whole process:
- Transplanting PE header from a dummy PE;
- Fix sections sizes, boundaries, permissions and Virtual Addresses in SectionHeaders;
- Setup section contents;
- Setup Optional Header fields;
- Setup PE checksum;
Here is the version of our binary after following up all steps described above [18]. This binary is a valid executable and we can load it in any debugger or disassembly but we still need to change one last thing before call it a valid unpacked Smokeloader sample.
Figure 05 shows our reconstructed PE loaded in IDApro paused on the correct Entry Point.
Figure 05 - Reconstructed PE paused on Entry Point |
We can notice that the entry point function receives an argument (0x02061737) and loads it into ECX and then calls another function located in 0x02061743 which is just below the current function. This argument is the address of the data segment. This data segment will be used for various tasks during Smokeloader execution including holding the dynamically created import table.
If we execute this file without a valid value in ECX it will break when the main payload tries to write into the data segment (invalid address in ECX). Figure 06 shows what happens when we try to execute our binary the way it is right now.
Figure 06 - Access Violation exception when executing unpatched reconstructed binary |
The plan now is to patch this binary to load the correct address of the data segment into ECX before calling "sub_2061743". Since both functions are consecutive and the function on top does not do much - we gonna replace all 15 bytes of this function (0x02061743 - 0x02061734). Figure 07 shows the new patched code.
Figure 07 - Code after patching |
In this new code the entry point remains the same. We can see that we loaded ECX with the address of the data segment by using the push and pop instructions and then we filled the rest of the remaining bytes with NOP (0x90). We can see the beginning of the second function at the same address as before (0x02061743). Of course there are many ways to achieve this same result but this was the simplest approach we could think of.
The final step is to update the PE checksum field inside the Optional Header again and we will have a fully unpacked Smokeloader sample. Here are the last version of our reconstructed binary [19]:
File name | new_pe_patched.bin |
File type | PE32 executable for MS Windows (console) Intel 80386 32-bit |
Size | 37888 bytes |
md5 | f401109ae24aaf47dce75266ffc049f8 |
sha1 | 49e7ed68b9569e0e987da71b3c678974d8ed7c81 |
sha256 | cd42f017913034d527d90a84feebcde015e714baa03714c83f80608555e52386 |
For testing our branding new reconstructed PE we ran it into Cuckoo sandbox [20] to analyse its behaviour [21]. As we can see in figure 08 and 09, the binary was executed properly and we got it checking in and contacting its controllers.
Figure 08 - Reconstructed sample connecting back to Controllers |
Figure 09 - List of API calls intercepted by Cuckoo |
As we can see we got the sample connecting back to three controller URLs and many pages of intercepted API calls in the behavioural analysis. This is an indication that our unpacked and reconstructed Smokeloader sample is functional.
So far we described how to unpack Smokeloader main payload and how to manually reconstruct a valid PE file out of this. Now we will automate what we did manually by transplanting a PE header from a dummy binary ("tinype.exe"). The Python library used in this experiment is LIEF [5]. We extended this example called "Create a PE from scratch" they have in their official documentation [22].
The following code does exactly the same as the manual approach but using LIEF.
The final binary generated by LIEF is:
File name | unpacked_smokeloader.exe |
File type | PE32 executable for MS Windows (console) Intel 80386 32-bit |
Size | 34816 bytes |
md5 | a0aebc61bc89208be0585eca4d1ed00c |
sha1 | ea2f3c914dec6bb36832abc313b3fce826cdecb0 |
sha256 | 0247de510507792fcbf425fab9dbbc2f067c25dc7e4e80a958d1ebfb0505f6e6 |
We uploaded it for testing to Virustotal [23] and CAPE sandbox [24] and is a valid unpacked Smokeloader PE32 executable.
[2] https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/debugapi/nf-debugapi-isdebuggerpresent
[3] https://malwareandstuff.com/examining-smokeloaders-anti-hooking-technique/
[4] https://www.elastic.co/blog/ten-process-injection-techniques-technical-survey-common-and-trending-process
[5] https://github.com/lief-project/LIEF
[6] https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/ddi/ntifs/nf-ntifs-rtldecompressbuffer
[7] https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/756dd799c8195b98f295baa210ac1807f7d1d86de2736f559c76ce1c7816d0ee/detection
[8] https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/787c762f7384dc8f427f76fb313e3bc248b09516a917426a533ed295bf1b593b/detection
[9] https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/3cae0d6a80a716b1c823e1f4011b3d07c4b3475a894751006874729d2145bbcf/detection
[10] http://security.neurolabs.club/2019/10/dynamic-imports-and-working-around.html
[11] https://www.sweetscape.com/010editor/
[12] https://www.sweetscape.com/010editor/repository/templates/file_info.php?file=EXE.bt
[13] http://www.phreedom.org/research/tinype/
[14] https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/718b03e878080c34f4a51c7243bb60024c7734f23d5715d6b97a5a4d54d7a630/detection
[15] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1b/Portable_Executable_32_bit_Structure_in_SVG_fixed.svg
[16] http://www.heaventools.com/
[17] http://www.hiew.ru/
[16] http://www.heaventools.com/
[17] http://www.hiew.ru/
[18] https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/3e474e495e11716f6eab40ee3c353602da2683dbefd900f6d90dfcedff2fa93d
[19] https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/cd42f017913034d527d90a84feebcde015e714baa03714c83f80608555e52386/detection
[20] https://www.capesandbox.com/
[21] https://www.capesandbox.com/analysis/7521/#behavior
[22] https://lief.quarkslab.com/doc/latest/tutorials/02_pe_from_scratch.html
[23] https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/0247de510507792fcbf425fab9dbbc2f067c25dc7e4e80a958d1ebfb0505f6e6
[24] https://www.capesandbox.com/analysis/7643/
This site have particular software articles which emits an impression of being a significant and significant for you individual, able software installation.This is the spot you can get helps for any software installation, usage and cracked.
ReplyDeletehard-disk-sentinel-pro-crack
wiztree-crac
easyworship-pro-crack
idm-crack-2
sweetscape-010-editor-crack
minitool-power-data-recovery-crack-cracke
pgware-gamegain-crack
This site have particular software articles which emits an impression of being a significant and significant for you individual, able software installation.This is the spot you can get helps for any software installation, usage and cracked.
ReplyDeletedisk-savvy-ultimate-enterprise-crack
sweetscape-010-editor-crack
This site have particular software articles which emits an impression of being a significant and significant for you individual, able software installation.This is the spot you can get helps for any software installation, usage and cracked.
ReplyDeletesweetscape-010-editor-crack
Such a Nice post. Thanks for Awesome tips Keep it up
ReplyDeletedisk-savvy-ultimate-enterprise-crack
tweak-ssd-version-crack
atto-disk-benchmark-crack
tweak-ssd-version-crack
3dyd-youtube-source-crack
If the supplier busts and the participant does not, the participant wins. In latest years, the company demand for lowering worker bills has led to another increase in table shift time. In many gaming operations throughout North America, sellers are required to 1xbet korea deal for 80 minutes, and it appears that|it appears that} that is changing into extra of the gaming trade norm.
ReplyDelete